On Wednesday, August 27, 2025, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department publicly censured attorney Eddie A. Pantiliat for professional misconduct linked to a prior disciplinary action in Arizona. Pantiliat faced disciplinary proceedings following a judgment from the Supreme Court of Arizona dated September 13, 2023.
The case is entitled “In the Matter of Eddie A. Pantiliat,” with case no. 2024-03677.
The New York court’s decision stemmed from Pantiliat’s violation of several rules of professional conduct while representing a real estate firm and its owner in Arizona. Specifically, he was found to have breached rules that require attorneys to withdraw from representation if it would result in a conflict of interest and prohibit giving legal advice to unrepresented parties when their interests conflict with those of the attorney’s client.
The case in Arizona involved Pantiliat representing BVO Luxury Groups and its owner in a lawsuit against former sales agents who were accused of stealing clients and trade secrets. During the proceedings, Pantiliat engaged in direct communication with one of the unrepresented defendants without involving their attorney, which ultimately led to complications in the case. His actions included attempting to solicit an affidavit from the defendant, which the latter refused to sign, believing it contradicted her prior sworn testimony and would result in perjury.
The Arizona court later ruled that Pantiliat had a professional obligation to maintain communication with the opposing counsel and that his conduct had caused disruptions in the court process. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court concluded that Pantiliat’s actions warranted sanctions, ultimately leading to a public reprimand and a one-year probationary period with mandatory continuing legal education.
In light of this disciplinary action, the New York Court issued an order on June 27, 2024, requiring Pantiliat to explain why he should not face reciprocal discipline under New York regulations. In his response, Pantiliat admitted to the misconduct but requested that the New York court impose only a public censure, arguing that his conduct was negligent rather than intentional.
The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District noted that Pantiliat did not raise any defenses as outlined in the relevant regulations and confirmed that his failure to disclose the Arizona disciplinary action was a violation of New York rules. The court found that significant weight should be given to the sanctions imposed by the Arizona court, considering it had the most interest in the matter.
Ultimately, the New York Supreme Court determined that Pantiliat’s actions warranted a public censure, aligning with the reciprocal discipline principles aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession.
The Disposition states:
“It is ORDERED that, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.13, the respondent, Eddie A. Pantiliat, is publicly censured for his professional misconduct.”
According to Avvo.com, Mr. Pantilliat is a personal injury attorney in Scottsdale, Arizona. He attended Whittier College School of Law. He acquired his law license in New York in 2017.
A copy of the original filing can be found here.
