On Thursday, August 7, 2025, the three-member panel of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued a public reprimand to Attorney Ian J. Musselman. This decision follows the approval of a Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent, which was reviewed by the panel.
The case is entitled “Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ian J. Musselman,” with case no. 66 DB 2025.
In addition to the reprimand, Musselman has been placed on probation for one year. The conditions of his probation include several requirements aimed at improving his legal practice. Within one month of receiving the reprimand, Musselman is required to submit a detailed summary to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC). This summary must outline the steps he has taken to enhance his case management, ensure timely communication with clients, and improve the handling of client funds, particularly regarding IOLTA management.
Throughout the probation period, Musselman must continue to implement the new procedures and protocols established, while also seeking guidance from counsel on any client management issues and compliance with ethical rules. Additionally, he is obligated to complete six continuing legal education (CLE) hours, which must include two hours focused on law practice management, IOLTA, and other law firm oversight programs.
Musselman is also expected to adhere strictly to ethical standards during his probation. Upon completing the probationary period, he will need to submit a sworn certification to the Board, confirming that he has fully complied with all stipulated conditions.
According to Avvo.com, Mr. Musselman is a family attorney in Eagleville, Pennsylvania. He attended Temple University – James E. Beasley School of Law, graduating in 2011. He acquired his law license in Pennsylvania in 2012.
A copy of the original filing can be found here.
